Japan EPI three-type architecture · trust type / bank type / funds-transfer-operator type overview
Wiki route
This entry sits under fintech index. Read it with Japan Financial Regulation — Legal Framework for Tokens, Crypto Assets, and Payments for adjacent context and Three-Layer Structure of Japan's Stablecoin Regulatory Regime (JPYC, USDC, Project Pax) for the broader system boundary.
[!info] TL;DR Japan’s revision of the “Payment Services Act” (2023) built the world’s most nuanced stablecoin framework —— the EPI (Electronic Payment Instrument) three-type architecture: trust type (Progmat XJPY) / bank type (Minna Bank + Fukuoka FG) / funds-transfer-operator type (JPYC). The three types differ greatly in regulatory burden, flexibility, and circulation restrictions. Japan is the world’s first major economy to define the legal status of stablecoins in explicit terms (2 years ahead of the GENIUS Act).
Key facts
- The “Payment Services Act” revision passed 2023 / came into force 2023-06 •
- Approximately 2 years ahead of the GENIUS Act •
- The Progmat trust type is designed to be non-MUFG-controlled (diversification of the single largest shareholder 49% + governance 51%) •
- JPYC is Japan’s only funds-transfer-operator-type SC holder •
- JPYC 2026-Q1 circulation 21 億円 + 6 万 holders + 2.6 -fold growth in 3 months •
- SBI Circle Holdings established 2025-08 · 50/50 equal investment · exclusive Japan distribution of USDC •
- Project Pax = a cross-border SC project of Japan’s three megabanks + Datachain · solves SWIFT compatibility only •
- Circulation cap of the funds-transfer-operator type: ¥100 万 / transaction (in part) •
Mechanism / How it works
EPI three-type comparison:
| Type | Issuer | Regulation | Flexibility | Circulation cap | Representative example |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trust type | Trust bank | Trust Business Act + EPI | High (any amount can be issued) | None | Progmat XJPY (MUFG Trust + Sumitomo Mitsui Trust + Mizuho Trust) |
| Bank type | Bank | Banking Act + EPI | Medium (linked to deposits) | Linked to the bank BS | Minna Bank SC (Solana route) |
| Funds-transfer-operator type | Funds-transfer operator | Payment Services Act | Low (small-amount cross-border with a ¥100 万 limit in part) | ¥100 万 / transaction (in part) | JPYC (Noritaka Okabe) |
Trust type (Progmat XJPY): a joint venture of the three megabanks Mitsubishi UFJ + Sumitomo Mitsui + Mizuho + Datachain, designed to be non-MUFG-controlled (diversification of the single largest shareholder 49% + governance 51%), targeting B2B large-ticket funds. Bank type (Minna Bank): Fukuoka FG / Minna Bank + the Solana route, targeting bank-customer retail. Funds-transfer-operator type (JPYC): led by Noritaka Okabe, Japan’s only funds-transfer-operator-type SC holder, 2.6 -fold growth in 3 months.
Origin & evolution
The 2017 “Payment Services Act” revision defined “virtual currency” for the first time. The 2019-04 revised Payment Services Act introduced the concept of “crypto-asset.” The 2022-06 passage of the revision bill introduced the EPI three-type framework. With its 2023-06 entry into force, Japan became the world’s first major economy to define the legal status of stablecoins in explicit terms. The 2025-08 establishment of SBI Circle Holdings changed the landscape: with exclusive Japan distribution of USDC, it forms the 4 camp together with JPYC / Progmat / Minna Bank; for details see Japan SC 4 -camp comparison · under the §501(d) lens, SBI Circle = #1. For an overview of Japan’s VASPs, see Domestic Crypto-Asset VASP Regulatory Timeline (2014–2026).
Related
- Wiki Index
- Japan SC 4 -camp comparison · under the §501(d) lens, SBI Circle = #1
- Three-Layer Structure of Japan's Stablecoin Regulatory Regime (JPYC, USDC, Project Pax)
- Japan trust-type SC architecture
- GENIUS Act §501
Sources
Discovery
Keep reading
Read next
- Japan Listed Company Disclosure Monitoring SOP (17 Channels) With appropriate channel selection, it is possible to efficiently cover supplementary information within minutes of a 15:00 announcement + next-day market sentiment tracking. fintech/japan-listed-company-disclosure-monitoring
- Japan Stablecoin 2026 event tracker · JPYC × Progmat × DCJPY × SBI VC Trade × FSA EPI amendment 2026 年 is the turning point of Japan's stablecoin industry from "PoC → mainnet." JPYC launched on the formal mainnet (Ethereum + Polygon + Astar) in 2025-Q4 and reached circulation of approx... fintech/japan-stablecoin-2026-event-tracker
Links here
- Japan stablecoin / BaaS bank perimeter (2025–2026) This entry sits under banking index as the bank-side perimeter view of the Japan stablecoin / electronic-payment-instrument (EPI) regulatory architecture. Read it with 日本 Stablecoin 法制度の三層構造... banking/japan-stablecoin-bank-perimeter-2025
- Japan stablecoin issuer regulatory classification matrix — Electronic Payment Instruments business / trust type / bank-issued type / funds-transfer-operator type / prepaid-payment-instrument boundary Japan's yen-denominated and USD-denominated stablecoins (explicitly defined as "electronic payment instruments" under the 2023-06 amended Payment Services Act) divide into 5 regulatory categ... exchanges/japan-stablecoin-issuer-regulatory-classification-matrix
- Domestic CEX × deposit tokens / EPI integration strategy — DCJPY / Progmat / JPYC collaboration This entry sits under exchanges index. Read it against グローバル CEX top 10 ランキング比較 (2025-2026) for peer / contrast context and FSA 暗号資産交換業登録制度 — 番号体系・財務局管轄・登録要件 for the broader system / regulat... exchanges/jp-cex-deposit-token-stablecoin-integration
- Domestic Crypto-Asset VASP Regulatory Timeline (2014–2026) Japan's crypto-asset regulation has been built up incrementally, triggered by both major domestic incidents (Mt.Gox, Coincheck) and international coordination pressure (FATF Travel Rule, MiC... exchanges/jp-vasp-regulatory-timeline
- Asia Tokenisation Infrastructure: Three Poles This entry sits under fintech index. Read it with 日本金融規制 — トークン・暗号資産・決済に関する法体系 for adjacent context and 日本 Stablecoin 法制度の三層構造(JPYC・USDC・Project Pax) for the broader system boundary. fintech/bis-project-guardian-vs-agora-asia-three-poles