FinWiki Public-source finance field guide
日EN

Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan

Confidence Likely
Updated 2026-05-25
Review by 2026-11-25
Sources 4 Machine-translated Original (JA)
#JapanFG#insurance#policyholder-protection#financial-safety-net
On this page

Wiki route

This entry sits under financial-regulators INDEX. Read it against Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation for a parallel safety-net peer and Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan (DIC) / Financial Services Agency (FSA) for the broader system / regulatory boundary.

TL;DR

An authorized corporation for the protection of policyholders, of which all non-life insurance companies operating domestically are members. It was established with the enforcement of the 1998-12 revised Insurance Business Act. It serves as the last safety net responsible for continuing the contracts of a failed non-life insurer + paying insurance claims + assuming contracts. Its funds consist of “assessments” contributed by members and “subsidies from the government (in the case of special measures).” It responded to the wave of non-life insurer failures in the latter half of the 1990 年s through the early 2000 年s (Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan 2000-05 / SOMPO Holdings (Sompo Holdings) 2001-11 / Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance 1996 , etc.). Its current membership is on the scale of 24 社 domestic non-life insurers. Together with the life-insurance version (Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation), it forms one of the two major insurance safety nets.

1. Legal basis / establishment

Legal name: Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation (損害保険契約者保護機構) English name: Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan Legal basis: Insurance Business Act, Article 259 and following (revised in 1995 年, fully enforced 1998-12 ) Established: 1998-12-01 Head office: Kanda-Awaji-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Type: authorized corporation Jurisdiction: Financial Services Agency (FSA) / the Ministry of Finance (jurisdiction over the statute)

Membership obligation

Key timeline

DateEvent
1995-06Full revision of the Insurance Business Act enacted (the old law was 1939)
1998-12Enforcement of the new Insurance Business Act / establishment of the Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation
2000-05**Failure of Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan** → the Corporation’s first full-scale rescue case
2001-11**Failure of SOMPO Holdings (Sompo Holdings)** → debate on strengthening the Corporation’s financial base
2002-06Revision of the Insurance Business Act → extension / expansion of the special-measure government subsidy
2010-04Review of the assessment system amid a phase of frequent natural disasters
2011-03The Great East Japan Earthquake → debate on the earthquake-insurance reinsurance scheme and mutual complementarity
2024〜Debate on the management integration of mid-tier non-life insurers and the stability of the Corporation’s finances

2. Business scheme

BusinessContent
Assumption of a failed insurance company’s contractsWhen no rescuing insurance company appears, the Corporation itself (or via a succeeding company) assumes the contracts
Financial assistance to a rescuing insurance companyA monetary grant when a rescuing insurance company takes over the failed insurance company
Compensation for insurance-claim paymentsCompensates a certain proportion of insurance-claim rights that had already arisen at the time of failure
Compensation for surrender refunds, etc.Compensates a certain proportion of surrender refunds, maturity refunds, etc.
Collection of assessmentsCollected from member non-life insurers each fiscal year (apportioned by premium income, etc.)
Borrowing of fundsBorrows from financial institutions when necessary (with a government guarantee)

Compensation levels (main lines)

Insurance lineCompensation level
Compulsory automobile liability insurance (CALI)100% (top priority because it is compulsory insurance)
Earthquake insurance100% (under the government reinsurance scheme)
Automobile insurance (voluntary)Accidents arising within 3 months after failure are 100%; thereafter 80%
Fire insurance (individual)80% (100% within 3 months after failure)
Liability insurance80%
Marine / transport / credit insurance, etc. (for enterprises)80%
  • Compensation levels vary by contract type and time of failure. For the latest details of the system, refer to the Corporation’s official website.

3. Funding structure

Revenue
  ├── Assessments (contributed by members 24 社, apportioned by premium income)
  ├── Borrowings (when necessary, with a government guarantee)
  └── Government subsidy (in the case of special measures, supplementary provisions of the Insurance Business Act)

Expenditure
  ├── Financial assistance to rescuing insurance companies
  ├── Operating expenses of succeeding insurance companies
  ├── Direct compensation payments to policyholders
  └── Operating expenses of the Corporation

Assessment calculation

4. Past rescue cases

DateFailed non-life insurerResolution scheme
1996Taisho Marine & FireRescue merger (assumed by Sumitomo Marine)
2000-05**Non-life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation of Japan**The Corporation’s first full-scale rescue (financial assistance)
2001-11**SOMPO Holdings (Sompo Holdings)**Corporation involvement; assumed by the Sompo Japan lineage (the former Yasuda Fire)
2008Yamato Life (a Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation case, as it is life insurance)—

From the middle of the 2000s onward, failure cases decreased substantially due to the management integration of mid-tier non-life insurers (the formation process of Sompo Japan Insurance / Aioi Nissay Dowa Insurance, etc.).

5. International comparison / issues

  • Close to the State Guaranty Fund system under U.S. NAIC guidelines, but Japan has a single nationwide corporation (the U.S. has one per state)
  • Whereas the U.K.’s FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme) unifies banking and insurance, Japan keeps the Deposit Insurance Corporation, the life-insurance corporation, and the non-life-insurance corporation separate
    • Review of the assessment system under climate-related risk (frequent and intensifying natural disasters)
    • Development of compensation schemes in response to the expansion of new insurance lines such as cyber insurance and pet insurance
    • Debate over the decline in membership and the financial base as the management integration of non-life insurers advances

Sources

[!info] Verification status

Discovery

Keep reading

Related

Read next

Links here