Impact of US approval of Bitcoin spot ETFs on domestic CEXs (2024-01~)
ConfidenceLikelyUpdated2026-07-29Review by2026-10-27Sources3Machine-translatedOriginal (JA)
On this page
Wiki route
This entry sits under exchanges index. Read it against Japan Institutional Custody Three-Pillar Structure — Komainu / Ginco / Fireblocks Japan Comparison for peer / contrast context and FSA crypto-asset exchange registration system — number system / Local Finance Bureau jurisdiction / registration requirements for the broader system / regulatory boundary.
1. Overview
On 2024-01-10, the US SEC approved exchange rule changes for 11 spot bitcoin ETPs, opening a route to bitcoin exposure through products traded on registered exchanges. The SEC itself stated that this action did not approve or endorse bitcoin or crypto trading platforms. The three proposed paths to Japan’s domestic CEXs—(a) spot prices and trading volume, (b) domestic institutional accounts, and (c) domestic ETF-policy debate—are analytical hypotheses in this entry; the SEC order does not establish causation for the Japanese market. ^[Sources: https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/sro/nysearca/2024/34-99306.pdf; https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/gensler-statement-spot-bitcoin-011023.]
2. Figures (2024-2026)
- IBIT (BlackRock): AUM on the scale of $80-100B · the largest share among spot ETFs · reached $50B AUM at the fastest pace in history
- Total AUM of US spot ETFs: $200B+ (2026 estimate) · absorbing a few percent of the world’s circulating BTC
- Coinbase Custody: holds custody for 9 件 of the 11 件 (oligopoly in institutional custody) — consistent with global-institutional-custody-five-pillars
- Daily net inflow: exceeded $1B/day at peak (during the spring-2024 and late-2024 rallies)
3. 3 -route impact on domestic CEXs
- (a) Price spillover: BTC spot price rises → increased domestic spot trading volume · 1 BTC surpassing 1,500 万円 (first reached 2024-03 ). jvcea-spot-volume-statistics-analysis also confirms a rebound in 2024 monthly spot trading volume
- (b) Institutionalization: acceleration of domestic corporate account openings · JVCEA statistics also show a net increase in corporate accounts in 2024+. bitFlyer / SBI VC Trade / Coincheck strengthened their corporate-oriented services
- (c) Debate over lifting the domestic ETF ban: in 2025-2026 the debate over domestic approval of BTC/ETH spot ETFs progressed at the FSA + industry bodies (JVCEA/JCBA) · not yet approved as of 2026-05 (requires legal amendment) — see jp-vasp-regulatory-timeline
4. Institutional barriers to lifting the ban on a Japan ETF
- Tax inequity: crypto assets are miscellaneous income (progressive, max 55%) · ETFs are subject to separate self-assessment taxation (20.315%) — a 35pp tax-rate gap on the same underlying asset
- Requires amendment of the FIEA + Investment Trust Act: adding crypto assets to the “investment-target assets” of investment trusts. Under the current Investment Trust Act, crypto is not enumerated as a “specified asset” in Article 2 , so it is at the level of a cabinet-order amendment
- Division among regulators: FSA supervisory guidelines + industry compliance cost · custody, valuation, and liquidity rules need to be put in place
- 2026 amendment proposal: under discussion · the staged view of sequentially lifting the ban on ETH/BTC is dominant
5. Investor implications
- Indirect exposure via US ETFs: Japanese investors can buy US spot ETFs (IBIT, etc.) via Nomura Securities / SBI Securities / Rakuten Securities / Monex Securities · without waiting for domestic approval, with tokutei-account support (20% separate self-assessment)
- Competitive pressure on domestic CEXs: when the ETF ban is lifted, there is a risk of declining share in domestic spot trading. In the US too, after spot-ETF approval, a trend of Coinbase retail spot trading volume flowing to ETFs was observed → this also affects the sales-outlet-model revenue of jp-cex-sales-vs-exchange-model-economics
- Inflow of institutional players: increasing strategic significance for major financial conglomerates such as Monex / SBI / Nomura / Sumitomo Mitsui Trust → jp-listed-cex-related-companies-matrix
Related
- global-institutional-custody-five-pillars — global institutional custody, the 5 pillars
- rwa-tokenization-cex-integration — RWA tokenization × CEX integration
- global-cex-prime-brokerage-layer — global CEX prime brokerage layer
Source: compiled from public information (SEC press, BlackRock IBIT prospectus, Coinbase Custody IR, FSA disclosures, Nikkei/ITmedia reporting, Bloomberg ETF flow data)
Discovery
Keep reading
Read next
- Bybit Lazarus $14.6 億 hack detailed analysis (2025-02) — largest crypto-asset outflow in history2025-02-21, approximately $14.6 億 (about 2,200 億円) equivalent of ETH + stETH + mETH and others flowed out of Bybit's ETH cold wallet. This is the largest crypto-asset theft in history, excee...
- CEX API / SDK ecosystem comparison — developer interfaces of domestic / overseas exchangesThe developer interfaces exposed by CEXs are broadly standardized across 3 tiers: (a) REST API (order placement · balance lookup · trade history · KYC settings, etc. — state-changing + snaps...
- Bithumb(빗썸)— Korea KRW spot CEX overviewMarket share, 24-hour volume, and rankings vary by timestamp and methodology, so this static entry does not freeze them. Comparisons should use the same provider, measurement time, and marke...
Links here
- Crypto-asset custody provider landscape matrix — Japan + Global institutional custody 10 社 technology / regulation / customer comparisonThe institutional crypto-asset custody market is differentiated along three axes: (1) technology model (cold storage / MPC / hybrid) × (2) license tier (Trust Charter / VASP / vendor only) ×...
- Global crypto-asset prime brokerage layer — Hidden Road / FalconX / Galaxy / B2C2 / CumberlandCrypto-asset prime brokerage is a layer that provides institutional investors with (a) consolidated accounts (multi-CEX cross-margin), (b) custody, (c) lending, (d) execution, and (e) report...
- Domestic CEX sales-counter vs exchange business-model economicsDomestic Japanese CEXs have a distinctive structure of running 2 service formats in parallel. The sales counter (hanbaijo) = an OTC-spread model in which the CEX itself trades against the cu...
- Domestic crypto-asset taxation detail — miscellaneous income vs separate self-assessment + individual vs corporateDomestically, crypto assets are taxed as "miscellaneous income"(雑所得)under the Income Tax Act(2017- the National Tax Agency developed a Q&A in step with the Virtual Currency Act's enforcement...
- Custodiem, Inc. — Japanese crypto-asset exchange service provider overviewCurrent service-site notices and trading rules take precedence for supported assets. The company states that operations related to running an exchange are suspended, while notices cover with...