The Agent Actorship Debate: 4 Camps
Wiki route
This entry sits under Skill marketplace monetization. Read it with Agent Payment Infrastructure Research Report for adjacent context and FinWiki index for the broader system boundary.
[!info] TL;DR On the question of whether AI agents constitute a new type of economic actor, there are 4 camps of position:
Camp A (already an actor): The moment it participates in price formation within a spontaneous order, it constitutes an actor (Hayek).
Camp B (can be conferred by institutions): The technical capability is already in place, but becoming an institutional actor with an independent system of liability and credit requires conferral by constitutive rules (Smith, Coase, Searle, de Soto).
Camp C (neither an actor nor needs to become one): Whatever cannot independently bear irreversible consequences is not an actor (Satoshi Nakamoto). The definitional debate is merely fleeing from the search for a breakthrough (Thiel). There is no need to grant it a title, but governance is essential (Han Fei).
Camp D (the framing of the question is itself wrong): One must transcend the actor / tool dichotomy itself (Latour). The agent is the first quasi-entity to act without human consent (Harari). The real question is who owns the agent and who carries off the surplus value (Marx).
Cross-camp consensus: The very act of building a credit-scoring and identity-registration system is itself an act of creating an institutional role for agents — this is a choice in institutional design, not a value-neutral technical question (Searle). With the advance of Skill marketplace monetization, the scale of A2A microtransactions will push this institution from optional to mandatory (for the underlying wallet permissions see ERC-4337; for the choice of settlement currency see USD Stablecoin Interchange Market).
Practical conclusion: A white paper should not take a contested definition as the starting point of its argument. We adopt the position that “function precedes definition” — the economic function of an agent exists prior to its legal definition, and Agent Payment Infrastructure Research Report does not depend on the conclusion of the definitional debate.
Related
Discovery
Keep reading
Read next
- Agent custody and authorization framework · 2026-05 reference architecture Agent custody and authorization in 2026 has converged into a three-axis design space: (1) custody model — full self-custody (user holds key, agent has no independent control), hybrid (Lit PK... agent-economy/agent-custody-and-authorization-framework-2026
- Agent-driven market data interpretation pipeline · feed → LLM → signal → trading system The 2026 agent-driven market data pipeline is a four-stage compound: (1) ingest raw market data from Bloomberg, Reuters / Refinitiv, Nikkei, exchange direct feeds, regulator releases, corpor... agent-economy/agent-driven-market-data-interpretation-pipeline
- Agent identity bridging DeFi and traditional finance · KYA, Skyfire, Lit PKP, mDL, MiCA, GENIUS Agent identity in 2026 sits at the bridge between DeFi-native primitives (smart-contract wallets, on-chain attestations, ERC-4337 / ERC-7702 wallets controlled by Lit PKP threshold keys or s... agent-economy/agent-identity-defi-and-traditional-finance-bridge
Links here
- Agent Payment Infrastructure Research Report This entry sits under AI agent payment protocols overview: seven-protocol map. Read it against paid skill-market monetization for peer / contrast context and payments index for the broader s... agent-economy/2026-04-08_agent-payment-infrastructure-research
- AI agent legal and tax liability framework · who is liable, how is agent income taxed As of mid-2026, no major financial regulator (US SEC / CFTC / FinCEN, UK FCA, Japan FSA, Singapore MAS, EU ESMA / EBA) has formally granted AI agents independent legal personhood, and no maj... agent-economy/agent-legal-tax-liability-framework
- The current state of AI companies' payment methods This entry sits under AI Agent payment protocol overview · seven-protocol survey. Read it with ERC-7715 overview · wallet permissions and AI Agent automated payments for adjacent context and... agent-economy/ai-company-payment-landscape
- AI-driven trading regulation · Japan FSA / SESC plus global FCA / SEC / ESMA comparison 2026 AI-driven trading regulation in 2026 sits on top of the existing algorithmic-trading regulatory perimeter rather than as a separate "AI trading rule." The Japan FSA + SESC (Securities and Ex... agent-economy/ai-driven-trading-regulation-japan-2026
- Embedded-wallet custody bankruptcy mechanics · what happens to end-user funds if Privy / Stripe / Coinbase CDP / AWS Bedrock fails End-user funds in an embedded wallet are on-chain at an address the user controls jointly with the provider, not on the provider's balance sheet. If Privy, Stripe (the Privy parent), Coinbas... agent-economy/embedded-wallet-custody-bankruptcy-mechanics